peacock the ‘burbs review: dark comedy, neighborhood secrets and a lesbian neighbor

keke palmer heads a spooky, funny suburban drama that balances mystery, social critique and a memorable lesbian neighbor played by paula pell

The ‘Burbs blends offbeat comedy with creeping unease on Peacock

The ‘Burbs, a new series on Peacock, follows a recently relocated family as suburban calm gives way to suspicion. At its center is Samira, played by Keke Palmer, a young mother negotiating early parenthood while becoming fixated on a dilapidated Victorian across the street. The show pairs comic set pieces with a steady undercurrent of dread as long-buried secrets are gradually revealed.

The series nods to the tone of the 1989 film of the same name while recalibrating its themes for a modern audience. It emphasizes character-driven investigation, social commentary and genre play. The result is a tone that shifts between laugh-out-loud moments and quietly unsettling beats. Supporting performances include Jack Whitehall, Mark Proksch and Julia Duffy, with a notable turn from Paula Pell, who brings an explicit queer presence to the neighborhood ensemble.

Setup and central mystery

The premise is straightforward: a family moves from the city to a picture-perfect cul-de-sac and soon suspects their neighbors hide dark truths. The mystery centers on why the Victorian home has been allowed to decay and what its occupants might be concealing. Narrative momentum comes from small domestic details that suggest larger dangers.

From a viewer’s perspective, the series trades on familiar suburban fears while asking whether obsession can become pathology. The show foregrounds Samira’s parental anxieties alongside a communal impulse to police outsiders. This dual focus gives the series both a personal axis and broader social commentary.

This dual focus gives the series both a personal axis and broader social commentary. The narrative follows Samira, her husband and a cluster of neighbors as they pivot from parental routines to collective investigation.

At the center is the Victorian house across the street. The building functions as a narrative engine and a symbolic landmark. It pulls the characters into an amateur sleuthing operation that alternates between comic missteps and genuine moral unease.

The plot moves from idle gossip to deliberate inquiry. Early episodes treat rumors—hauntings, tragic backstory and eccentric conduct—as local color. Subsequent installments shift tone and stakes, revealing mundane motives alongside darker, concealed actions. The writing doles out revelations steadily while preserving suspense toward each episode’s cliffhanger.

From a character standpoint, the investigation exposes private strains and unexpected solidarities. Scene work centers on small gestures and domestic detail, which illuminate tensions within family life and neighborly bonds. These moments anchor the series’ social observations in lived experience.

Structurally, the show balances serialized mystery with episodic payoff. Viewers receive incremental answers alongside fresh complications, a design that sustains engagement without flattening the central enigma. The result is a genre blend that mixes light satire with measured dread, and that reframes suburban routine as a site of hidden histories.

Characters, tone and representation

The ensemble blends eccentricity with authenticity. Samira’s viewpoint remains the narrative anchor. She appears sharp, exhausted and persistently skeptical.

Rob’s backstory within the neighborhood introduces unresolved questions about his omissions. Their neighbors provide both comic relief and emotional ballast through distinct, often contradictory traits. This balance keeps the series from tipping into parody while preserving its stakes.

A central relationship is the friendship between Samira and Dana, portrayed by Paula Pell. Dana uses humour and lived experience to negotiate acceptance within the community. The pacing of their scenes shifts the series between levity and tension.

The result is a deliberate genre blend that pairs light satire with measured dread. From a structural standpoint, the show reframes suburban routine as a repository of obscured histories and small moral reckonings.

Dal punto di vista del paziente—here understood as the viewer inhabiting a character’s perspective—the series foregrounds how everyday domestic pressures compound more private troubles. The narrative choices privilege character observation over plot-driven spectacle.

The narrative choices privilege character observation over plot-driven spectacle. The series foregrounds representation through lived detail rather than exposition. Pell’s Dana is noteworthy because her marriage appears through anecdotes and a vivid origin story, not through staged plot beats. Her lines often reference lesbian identity with warmth and swagger, making sexuality part of character economy rather than a label slapped on for diversity metrics.

Humor and social critique

Comedic moments function as social commentary. Jokes such as the informal “lesbian oath” about protecting animals act as shorthand for personality and community values. They also remind viewers that queer lives are woven into the neighborhood’s everyday fabric. The show avoids tokenism by integrating Dana’s sexuality into the cul-de-sac’s social texture, so identity informs interactions without dominating them.

Continuing the focus on character-driven storytelling, The ‘Burbs alternates satirical takes on suburban conformity with darker notes of comedy. The series skewers homeowners association culture, performative friendliness and the veneer of safety that many neighborhoods promote. It also foregrounds racial tension: Samira, one of the few residents of color, faces microaggressions and overt prejudice, and the show depicts her allies confronting those incidents rather than allowing them to pass unchallenged.

Genre mixing and deliberate pacing

By blending dark comedy with mystery beats, the series resists a single-genre label. It recalls works that critique domestic serenity while keeping drama grounded in plausibility rather than supernatural spectacle. The pacing emphasizes incremental clues and character revelations. Occasional pop-culture asides undercut tension with wry humor. That approach invites viewers to assemble meaning while exposing suburban absurdities.

Highlights and final impressions

That approach invites viewers to assemble meaning while exposing suburban absurdities. The series rests on a strong ensemble that carries tonal shifts with precision.

Keke Palmer anchors the show with a layered lead performance. She moves convincingly between anxious new parent and determined investigator. Paula Pell supplies steady comic relief and a sense of communal texture that raises the emotional stakes.

Supporting players add distinct, memorable details that preserve the cul-de-sac’s lived-in unpredictability. The show balances mystery, satire and character study without losing narrative momentum.

The depiction of suburban life interrogates the notion that tidy appearances equal moral clarity. The series reveals how polite routines can mask complex, sometimes alarming realities. The first season concludes on a cliffhanger that points to further unraveling and sustained tonal sharpness.

Scritto da Sofia Rossi

queer celeb roundup: waffles, style moments and travel vibes

zane phillips’ fashion moment, apple tv’s emmys slate and nicole kidman’s scarpetta trailer